Just 4 years ago, the media condemned President Trump for authorizing airstrikes in Syria…
Now that Biden’s sending the bombs, they’ve changed their tune.
It’s actually worse than it sounds… here’s what makes Biden’s bombing so bad.
No money for $2000 checks, but more than enough to fund yet more bombing for the Obama-started war in Syria…
When Joe Biden started the first of his bombing campaigns just last week, the media fawned over it… declaring it a “new era” for politics… despite it seeming very familiar to anyone paying attention…
Since Obama started the war in Syria, the media were just as complementary. That all ended when President Trump won the election.
Suddenly, any kind of bombing transformed in the media’s eyes, going from a standard part of the presidency to a “vicious crime”. Now, it’s transformed again – and all it took was the media’s favorite team getting into office.
In fact, it’s not quite as simple as it may seem… it’s a whole lot worse.
The thing is, when President Trump authorized strikes in Syria, we were living in a very different world.
For one, he was fighting back against ISIS (seen them recently? Didn’t think so), while Biden’s strikes were aimed at a completely irrelevant group… they’re going to do more to radicalize than they are to fight terror.
Secondly, he wasn’t spending millions on bombs at a time when an uncountable number of average Americans were starving thanks to the pandemic…
And thirdly, Trump’s team weren’t personally profiting from the bombs being dropped. With so many key members of Biden’s team having heavily invested in military contractors, they’re getting paid off every time a bomb hits.
They have a real financial incentive to bomb as much as possible… to start new wars across the globe.
They’re not getting paid to help you… so don’t expect them to keep a single promise about improving your life, doing anything to help you out.
